What’s the Difference Between IDS and IPS—and When Do You Use Each?

What Are Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDS and IPS)?

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) are essential components of a modern cybersecurity strategy. While they share the goal of identifying malicious activity, their roles in response differ significantly. IDS observes and alerts, whereas IPS takes action.

Understanding when to deploy each and how to use them effectively is critical for risk-aware network defense in 2025.

IDS vs. IPS: Know the Functional Differences

At the core, IDS is passive and observational. It scans traffic, detects anomalies, and alerts security teams. IPS is active and can block or mitigate threats as they occur.

Key distinctions include:

• Function:
  • IDS monitors and alerts but doesn’t interfere with traffic.
  • IPS actively blocks malicious packets in real time.
• Deployment:
  • IDS operates out-of-band and does not sit inline with traffic.
  • IPS inspects traffic inline, making decisions before infiltration.
• Response:
  • IDS logs and alerts for further investigation.
  • IPS resets connections, blocks traffic, or quarantines threats.
• Latency impact:
  • IDS introduces little to no performance delay.
  • IPS may cause latency.
• Management:
  • Both IDS and IPS tuning can help make alerts more useful.

The bottom line: IDS identifies issues and IPS intervenes.

When IDS Is the Right Fit

IDS works well in environments where:

• Blocking legitimate traffic would cause major disruptions (such as in healthcare or financial services)
• Analysts are available to investigate alerts promptly
• Forensic analysis or threat hunting is required
• Compliance mandates detailed traffic inspection and logging

Common IDS scenarios:

• Monitoring critical infrastructure for anomalies
• Supporting compliance audits (such as with PCI DSS)
• Providing historical traffic data for investigations

When to Deploy IPS

IPS is better suited for settings where speed and enforcement matter. It is ideal for:

• Blocking known exploits in real time
• Reducing the attack surface at internet-facing boundaries
• Enforcing security policy in segmented environments
• Protecting against automated reconnaissance or malware

Organizations that need immediate mitigation will benefit from IPS.

Can IDS and IPS Be Used Together?

Organizations can and often do deploy IDS and IPS together, particularly given their interlocking or complementary capabilities. Many organizations deploy them in a layered approach.

Combining IDS and IPS allows teams to:

• Detect complex threats while preventing known ones
• Balance alert triage with real-time blocking
• Improve visibility

Questions to Ask Before Deployment

Selecting the right tool or combination of tools requires a clear view of your environment.

Key considerations include:

• Network design: Are sensitive assets isolated or exposed?
• Traffic volume: Can your infrastructure support inline scanning at scale?
• Threat profile: Are you defending against known malware, zero-days, ransomware actors, particular threat actors, or all of the above?
• Operational readiness: Do you have staff to manage tuning, alerts, and response?

The answers will help define whether IDS, IPS, or both should be prioritized.

Detection Techniques: Signature vs. Behavior-Based

Both IDS and IPS rely on a few different approaches to detect threats:

• Signature-based detection:
  • Fast and reliable for known threats
  • Blind to novel or obfuscated attacks
• Behavior-based detection:
  • Identifies anomalies based on traffic baselines
  • May be prone to false positives if not calibrated correctly

Managing False Positives and Negatives

IDS and IPS both face a core challenge: Separating signal from noise.

• False positives can flood teams with alerts that are actually benign, or trigger unintended service disruptions
• False negatives may allow true threats to slip through

Security teams must treat tuning as a continuous process, not a one-time task. Security teams should consider mitigation strategies to avoid these grave errors:

• Regularly tune rules and baselines
• Enrich alerts with context, such as with threat intelligence services or feeds
• Implement automated playbooks for high-confidence detections

Experience Comprehensive Cyber Risk Management with MAX
SecurityScorecard’s MAX is a fully managed service that combines our advanced platform with expert driven remediation. We handle the complexities of supply chain cybersecurity, allowing you to focus on your strategic business operations.
🔗 Discover MAX