TITAN AI Now Runs Third-Party Risk Management End to End

Learn how TITAN AI now runs third-party risk management end to end, replacing disconnected tools with one connected workflow built on continuous intelligence and AI agents.

Most third-party risk management (TPRM) programs still run on a ratings tool, a questionnaire tool, and a GRC system. Those get stitched together by hand, and the seams are where risk slips through. SecurityScorecard’s TITAN AI platform connects vendor intake, assessment, continuous monitoring, remediation, and reporting into one workflow.

Announced at RSA Conference 2026 and built on top of SecurityScorecard’s Ratings and TPRM platform, TITAN AI replaces the reactive, manual grind of legacy TPRM programs with continuous intelligence, AI-accelerated automation, and threat-informed remediation.

The result is a program that runs itself where a human is not the bottleneck, and pulls your team in only for the calls that need judgment.

From Three Offerings to One Workflow

TITAN Watch, TITAN Assess, and TITAN Secure now operate as a single workflow. TITAN Watch delivers continuous visibility into your vendor landscape, TITAN Assess automates the manual work of questionnaires and assessments, and TITAN Secure brings real-time threat intelligence into remediation.

That connection is the differentiator. TITAN AI is the only platform in third-party risk management that owns both the data and the workflow in one system. Everywhere else, a data source like a ratings vendor gets wired into a separate GRC or TPRM system of record, and the two have to be integrated and maintained separately.

TITAN AI removes that seam. A change on one vendor flows straight from monitoring into an assessment or a remediation request, with no analyst carrying it between screens and no integration holding it together. Because that same infrastructure ties enterprises and vendors together in one operational layer, both sides can act on a finding in real time instead of waiting on an email chain.

That’s not a theoretical benefit. Companies around the globe are already putting it to work.

The Hershey Company manages a vendor ecosystem that spans ingredient suppliers, co-manufacturers, packaging partners, and logistics providers across a global supply chain — the kind of footprint where a single unmonitored vendor can become a production or compliance problem fast. Phil Addison, Manager of Third-Party Cyber Risk Management at Hershey, needed a way to see which of those relationships actually carried risk in real time, to drive compliance and security risk reduction.

“TITAN AI hands us context we can act on instead of one more alert to chase. It’s the third-party cyber risk intelligence platform enabling business resilience across our vendor ecosystem.”

— Phil Addison, Manager of Third-Party Cyber Risk Management, The Hershey Company

Intake and Risk Tiering Without the Manual Triage

Intake used to be the first bottleneck. A vendor’s risk tier, scorecard, and business context lived in separate systems, so no one could size a new vendor without touching three tools first. TITAN AI resolves the legal entity, pulls the scorecard, and tiers the vendor from a single submission, so risk scoping and vendor visibility happen in one connected flow instead of separate manual steps.

Organizations can complete the vendor intake process within Titan AI. They would start by building the form directly in the platform. This form will contain all of the questions that they’d like. They have the ability to add more questions, remove questions. Each question will get mapped to a field that will be stored within the vendor’s profile. You can also decide if they want questions to be required or not and if it affects the risk score. These risk rules will determine how critical the vendor ends up being. This is all customizable as well, and you can add different conditions to help influence the risk level. These conditions can be tested to see what the outcome will be if a certain field is entered. Once the form is built, the link can be shared with internal stakeholders, colleagues, other team members, whoever is requesting a new vendor for the organization. The form is accessed through the URL that was shared. From here, a user can add in all the information for the new vendor. They could put in notes and have the AI prefill the form, or they can manually start filling out the fields that the form is asking for. Spender has not been assessed yet. Enter in an internal business owner, some sample numbers, and I can submit this form. Once the form is submitted, the vendor will show up as a new item in the vendor intake list. I would be able to open up the form and see all of the details that was provided about the vendor. And from here, I can select whether I’d like to complete the intake or reject the intake.

Assessments an Agent Reviews First

The assessment bottleneck was never really the questionnaire. It was reading every response and every attached document by hand, one vendor at a time.

Now you can build the questionnaire from scratch or an existing template, send it through a passwordless link vendors can actually open, and let a Review Agent run the same evaluation on every submission, so your team reviews the two or three answers that need a decision instead of the hundred that do not.

That shift is what moves the metrics that matter: more assessments per analyst, shorter cycle times, and higher vendor response rates, because removing the login wall is what used to cause vendors to give up.

Titan assess is taking us out of spreadsheets. We can run evaluations on vendors using their already available documentation and provide prioritized risk reports, draft remediation messages, and close the vendor loop without ever opening a PDF or a spreadsheet. So how do we go from a questionnaire to a single screen of analysis? It starts with our agentic template editor. Import any spreadsheet, then attach evaluation criteria to each question. From there, a mix of deterministic and AgenTik review checks two things, whether a vendor’s attestation matches your policies and whether it holds up against their own audited reports. With our template built, I have two options. I can run an autofill based on the vendor’s available documentation, or I can invite the vendor to complete it themselves.

Monitoring That Knows What Attackers Are Doing Right Now

A typical portfolio produces thousands of findings, and treating them all as equally urgent is close to treating none of them as urgent. TITAN Secure scores findings against active threat activity instead of a static scoring model, so the vendors tied to real exploitation surface first.

Once a finding clears that bar, a Response Agent takes over the busywork: it drafts and sends the remediation request, follows up automatically on a set cadence, and escalates anything that goes unresolved, with no analyst triggering a single one of those steps by hand. When a vendor claims a fix, auto-rescan verification checks the claim instead of accepting it at face value, and reopens the finding if the fix didn’t actually hold.

This is a demo of Titan Secure’s drive remediation workflow. It’s the workflow you use once you know availability or exposure exists on a vendor’s assets and you need it fixed. This workflow is built for the TPR analyst running day to day remediation with visibility for the TPR manager tracking resolution rates across the portfolio. If you’re the person deciding which fires to put out first, this is your workflow. And as you can see here on our findings view, across the portfolio, that’s thousands of findings. And most tools prioritize based on historical experience, not what’s happening right now. That means that some of the issues that matter most today aren’t prioritized, and some that got flagged months ago are still at the top of the list. Titus Secure ships with presets built by our Strike Threat research team. Instead of scoring findings by what happened in the past, these presets rank findings by what matters now. This one called emerging threat wash narrows down thousands of findings down to the ones tied active threat campaigns today. Same portfolio, same findings, but now the risk… The list reflects the current risk landscape instead of a correlated score set. Click on any finding, and you’ll get the specifics, The CV, how severe it is, and whether it’s an active exploitation using CISA’s KEV list. That KEV stats is what keeps this forward looking. It’s not just how bad the vulnerability could be. It’s whether attackers are actually using it right now. From there, you can choose an action. Request remediation sends a targeted message to the vendor about this finding, not a bulk list of everything wrong in their environment. You can also send an internal message, accept the risk formally, or flag it to boost internal prioritization without notifying the vendor at all. When you request remediation, the vendor will get a request about this one issue. They know exactly what to fix, which means they can actually triage it. Instead instead of getting a bulk ask, they’ll be prioritized because everything on the list looks equally urgent. The request then lands in our exchange hub alongside everything else you’ve sent to this vendor. Same centralized thread as any other communication. You’re not tracking this in a spreadsheet on the side. And when the vendor tells you it’s fixed, Titan doesn’t… Titan doesn’t just take their word for it. We automatically rescan the asset. And if a vulnerability is actually gone, the finding closes, and you have a verified record. So that’s Stripe remediation in Titan Secure, from thousands of the findings to the ones that matter, to a targeted request to the vendor that the vendor can actually act on to a verified close. One workflow that TBR analysts can run without reading every finding or trusting every vendor claim.

One Workflow for the Whole Program

A workflow builder chains intake, assessment, and remediation together with no custom code, so a new policy applies to every future vendor automatically instead of one vendor at a time.

That same connected data produces a program-level readout built for the three questions leadership actually asks: how urgent, how is it progressing, and how responsive are our vendors. Your team walks into a board or audit conversation with a live system of record behind the numbers, not a set of exports stitched together the night before.

In this video, I’m gonna be going over workflows. It is one of the new automations available on the Titan AI platform. It is something that is tremendously awesome. So, ultimately, when a user logs into Titan, they have the ability to navigate to workflows. And as you can see, they can have a multitude of workflows in different categories of a draft format published, what’s actively running, paused, completed, failed, canceled. And, ultimately, the workflow builder will have a multitude of templates that customers can lean on to say, hey. I I would like to build a workflow around vendor intake or a quarterly vendor review or findings review or continuous monitoring. But, ultimately, what a workflow is is being able to mix and match different outcomes with different triggers from within the Titan platform. Ultimately, empowering customers to say, hey. Why does an alert have to now require two to three manual tasks where I move the the the ball down the field, so to speak, to the next stage where then I wait for the next set of an alert? Right? An example would be a vendor intake form coming in, getting an alert that it’s been completed. Well, now I would have to go into the platform, review the intake form, see what the inherent risk came through as, whether it’s low, medium, high, or critical, making that determination of what’s the next step, triggering out the proper assessment to that vendor. And now I can pause and wait for the next alert to come in where I would receive the alert that that assessment’s been completed. With workflows, you can automate and map all of that out with ease within the within within the Titan platform. So what ultimately it can look like is the trigger can be a vendor intake has came into the platform. The system will analyze the responses. If it’s low inherent risk based on the risk scoring, maybe you get an alert, and the vendor’s been added to a portfolio for monitoring. No assessment been sent. Same for medium. But maybe if it’s a high or critical supplier based on inherent risk, we tell the platform to natively pull vendor details, grab the template that we need to send that’s associated with that vendor intake. Right? Maybe it is the the SIG, like, gets sent to critical suppliers. And now we send the questionnaire. And now I get an alert when the questionnaire comes back completed, and then I just need to pop in and look at the Titan analysis of the assessment. Or maybe I get the notification that the questionnaire is overdue, but we also wanna trigger that reminder to the supplier as well. And then I get the final alert once everything’s completed, ultimately empowering me as the vendor risk manager to automate a lot of these workflows and tasks where I’m really getting alerted about completed risks or completed evaluations where now my expertise, my review is needed. But I do not need to manually trigger these assessments to go out. I can automate the workflow, give it the guidelines and strategy around what I would like to see in terms of next steps. And, of course, you can have a multitude of these workflows. They can they can meld and work with alerting as well, And an agent for normal language will be available to support the building of these web charts, so to speak, using normal language. So customers do not necessarily need to build something from scratch or lean on a template. However, it is very easy to edit. Right? If I wanted to bring in generate a micro summary and pull this out, I can actually connect the two. I can drag this into the below view. I can add different steps or tasks accordingly.

You Choose How Much of This Runs on Its Own

None of this requires an all-or-nothing bet on AI. You can configure a workflow anywhere on the spectrum, from full human control to full automation. A team new to automation can require a person to approve every remediation request before it goes to a vendor. A team ready to move faster can let the agent run the same workflow end to end and step in only when something is flagged.

Every customer ramps at a different pace, and that pace is set by the customer. As trust in the system builds, teams can deliberately loosen that gate for specific, well-proven actions, rather than treat it as fixed. Every action carries a record of what ran and why, regardless of where that dial is set. Nothing runs invisibly, and nothing requires your team to hand over more control than it wants to.

Built for Programs Running on a Fixed Team

Most TPRM programs run more vendors than their staffing ratio can support. A ratio of one analyst per 600 or more vendors is not unusual, and the vendor count keeps growing while headcount does not.

TITAN AI is built to close that specific gap: organizations using it report up to 95% less manual effort, 9x higher vendor engagement, and up to 75% fewer supply-chain breaches. Those numbers move because the work moved, not because the team got bigger. SecurityScorecard also reports 99.9% accurate risk attribution with a near-zero refute rate, which is why both internal teams and external vendors trust the findings enough to act on them.

See the Workflow

TITAN AI is available today for organizations ready to move their third-party risk management program from assessment paperwork to one connected workflow. Request a demo to see TITAN AI run intake through remediation on your own vendor portfolio.

Platform

2026 Supply Chain Cybersecurity Trends Report

Solutions

2026 Supply Chain Cybersecurity Trends Report

Featured

Collateral

Learning

Tools