Why customers choose SecurityScorecard over Upguard
Tailored Insights
Custom scorecards deliver ratings tailored to the specific vendor elements that matter most
Bigger Picture
Comprehensive threat intelligence and AI agents protect your entire supply chain proactively
Managed TPRM Services
MAX delivers full TPRM program management — from questionnaires to program oversight
Proven where others fall short
Tailored Insights
Custom scorecards allow risk managers to tailor their lens to the specific elements of a vendor that are relevant to the organization – limiting false signal and ensuring that focus is kept where it is most critical to your organization.
- Custom scorecards deliver ratings tailored to the specific vendor elements that matter most
Bigger Picture
SecurityScorecard’s TITAN platform delivers a comprehensive Third Party Risk management solution. Our Threat-Informed TPRM approach enables risk managers to quickly and accurately prioritize threats across the supply chain and manage remediation activities at scale.
- Comprehensive threat intelligence and AI agents protect your entire supply chain proactively
MAX: Your TPRM Program, Fully Managed
MAX Services provide a comprehensive suite of management offerings for your TPRM program. TITAN MAX Services enable customers to do more with the TITAN platform, by providing dedicated, expert resources that can assist with key elements, or even run the entire TPRM Program for customers.
- MAX Questionnaires enable customers to offload one of the most demanding yet vital aspects of the TPRM to our experts, while still enabling the customer to manage the overall program
- MAX Monitor enables customers to offload the day-to-day management of their TPRM Program, freeing up key resources
- MAX Respond handles vendor engagement and escalation when potential risks or issues are identified within the supply chain
See what our customers think
Compare SecurityScorecard with other tools
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How do SecurityScorecard and UpGuard differ in how vendor risk coverage is priced and structured?
SecurityScorecard provides deep risk intelligence for both first-party assets and third-party vendors under a unified pricing model, without applying separate charges for vendor coverage. UpGuard positions itself as the lowest-cost option in the market, which can be attractive for budget-constrained programs, but this typically involves tradeoffs in data depth, analyst recognition, and coverage accuracy. Organizations evaluating both platforms should look beyond entry-level pricing and assess the total cost and capability required to fully cover their vendor portfolio at the depth and accuracy their program demands.
What should organizations consider when comparing user management and permissions flexibility between SecurityScorecard and UpGuard?
Enterprise TPRM programs typically involve multiple stakeholders — security teams, procurement, legal, and business unit leads — each requiring different levels of access and visibility. SecurityScorecard supports unlimited user creation with granular, role-based permission controls, enabling organizations to delegate access appropriately across complex team structures. UpGuard’s user and permissions model is more restrictive, which can create operational friction in programs where access needs to be distributed across departments or business units. Evaluating user management flexibility early in the selection process helps avoid governance complications as programs scale.
How should organizations weigh price against platform depth and data quality when choosing between SecurityScorecard and UpGuard?
Price is a legitimate evaluation criterion, but it should be weighed against the quality and completeness of the risk intelligence being purchased. UpGuard is widely recognized as the lowest-cost option in the security ratings market, making it attractive for organizations with constrained budgets or limited program scope. However, this comes with documented tradeoffs: lower independent analyst scores, less comprehensive data coverage, and susceptibility to vendor gaming — where suppliers can improve scores through surface-level changes without addressing underlying risk. Organizations with mature vendor risk programs that require defensible, accurate risk signals will typically find SecurityScorecard’s deeper platform justifies the cost difference.
