Why customers choose SecurityScorecard over Black Kite
Data Ownership & Quality
99.9% of our data is collected directly by SecurityScorecard — no third-party sources, no accuracy gaps
Comprehensive Platform
Custom scorecards and AI-driven questionnaires deliver tailored, thorough vendor risk assessments
Managed TPRM Services
TITAN MAX delivers full TPRM program management — from questionnaires to complete program oversight
Proven where others fall short
Unparalleled Accuracy and Transparency
SecurityScorecard collects 99.9% of the data utilized by TITAN. This ensures that data presented is curated and reconciled directly by SecurityScorecard, but that any updates or needed refinements happen quickly.
- Data accuracy and correction speeds are public, not hidden
- < 4 hours average response time to remediate inaccuracies
Comprehensive Platform
SecurityScorecard delivers a complete Vendor risk management solution. Custom scorecards allow risk managers to tailor their lens to the specific elements of a vendor that matter, while our comprehensive assessment and questionnaire capabilities ensure that all relevant details regarding a vendor’s security and compliance posture are surfaced and accounted for.
- Custom scorecards and AI-driven questionnaires deliver tailored, thorough vendor risk assessments
MAX: Your TPRM Program, Fully Managed
MAX Services provide a comprehensive suite of management offerings for your TPRM program.
- MAX Questionnaires enable customers to offload one of the most demanding yet vital aspects of the TPRM to our experts, while still enabling the customer to manage the overall program
- MAX Monitor enables customers to offload the day-to-day management of their TPRM Program, freeing up key resources
- MAX Respond handles vendor engagement and escalation when potential risks or issues are identified within the supply chain
See what our customers think
Compare SecurityScorecard with other tools
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How do SecurityScorecard and Black Kite differ in scope for organizations that need GRC, due diligence, and operational risk capabilities?
Black Kite is primarily focused on cyber risk monitoring and financial quantification — it is not designed to support broader due diligence, GRC workflows, or operational risk requirements such as compliance evidence management, onboarding workflows, or governance integration. Organizations with multi-dimensional vendor risk programs that span cyber and non-cyber risk factors will encounter coverage gaps with Black Kite. SecurityScorecard’s platform extends across security ratings, GRC integration, compliance automation, questionnaire management, and in-house professional services — making it a more complete solution for programs that require more than cyber risk scoring alone.
How do vendor access models differ between SecurityScorecard and Black Kite, and why does it matter for remediation programs?
Vendor access models directly affect the practical effectiveness of risk remediation programs. Black Kite limits supplier platform access to 14 days — after which vendors must obtain a paid license to continue viewing their findings or tracking remediation progress. SecurityScorecard provides vendors with permanent, free access to their scorecard, including the ability to dispute findings and monitor remediation progress on an ongoing basis. Permanent free vendor access removes a common barrier to supplier engagement and supports more collaborative, continuous improvement in vendor risk posture without requiring vendors to absorb additional cost.
