What Are Proxy Browsers? How Cybercriminals Use Them In Attacks

What Are Proxy Browsers?

Proxy browsers are web browsers that route internet traffic through intermediary servers—known as proxies—rather than connecting directly to websites. This design allows users to mask their IP addresses, hide geographic locations, and obscure device identifiers. Proxy servers act as a bridge between users and web servers, anonymizing web requests and ensuring secure connections.

In legitimate contexts, proxy browsers are often used to protect privacy, conduct compliance testing, or bypass local censorship. Businesses may also use them for geolocation testing or security research. However, cybercriminals exploit the very same features to bypass security controls, automate attacks, and cover their tracks.

By enabling anonymity and location spoofing, proxy browsers have become essential components of modern cyberattack infrastructure. Many rely on high anonymity proxies or transparent proxies, which conceal the user’s IP address and add layers of complexity to threat detection.

How Do Attackers Use Proxy Browsers?

Cybercriminals use proxy browsers to conduct a broad range of malicious activities. These browsers allow attackers to obscure their origins, evade detection, and execute attacks without triggering IP-based defenses. The proxy hides the attacker’s original IP address, making attribution more difficult.

Common attacks involving proxy browsers include:

• Credential stuffing and brute-force attacks: Attackers automate login attempts across multiple accounts using lists of leaked credentials. Proxy browsers enable IP rotation, making it harder for rate limits and geolocation filters to stop these attacks.
• Phishing infrastructure deployment: Threat actors host fake login pages on proxy-enabled infrastructure. These sites appear legitimate, while the backend infrastructure stays hidden behind rotating proxies.
• Scraping and reconnaissance: Threat actors collect sensitive data—ranging from pricing models to API structures—using headless browsers running behind proxy configurations. This helps them avoid detection and throttling.
• Command-and-control (C2) communications: Proxy browsers are used to establish communication between infected systems and attacker-controlled infrastructure, often blending into legitimate web traffic.
• Click fraud and ad abuse: Some attackers use proxy browsers to simulate user activity for fraudulent ad clicks or affiliate program abuse.

The ability to easily embed proxy browsers into automated attack frameworks can make them attractive to both amateur hackers and organized cybercrime groups. These tools reduce friction, scale rapidly, and mask attribution. Hackers can use reverse proxy servers and forward proxies to ensure traffic is routed efficiently and stealthily.

Types of Proxy Browsers Used in Cybercrime

Proxy browser tools come in multiple forms, with varying levels of sophistication:

• Plain proxy browsers: Standard browsers manually configured with SOCKS5 or HTTP proxies (which is more common for web browsing).
• Browser extensions: Plugins that manage rotating proxy lists.
• Tor-based browsers: Tor browsers anonymize web traffic and can be used to anonymize both browsing and outbound C2 traffic. Cybercriminals can use Tor-based browsers to conduct reconnaissance, steal data, and more.

Some attackers build custom proxy browsers into malware payloads or remote access trojans (RATs), further blurring the lines between legitimate traffic and attacker behavior. Free proxy services and free web proxies are often bundled in these kits, which require no software installation and allow access to restricted sites.

Why Proxy Browser Traffic Is Hard to Detect

Detecting malicious proxy browser activity is challenging for security teams. Many of the tactics used by attackers resemble legitimate behavior or originate from infrastructure shared with benign users.

Key detection challenges include:

• Shared proxy infrastructure: Businesses and bad actors alike use popular commercial proxies, including residential proxy IP services. Blocking these IPs may disrupt legitimate services.
• Encryption masking: TLS and HTTPS encrypt the traffic, making it harder to inspect payloads or destination domains. Even if the traffic looks suspicious, its contents remain opaque due to SSL encryption and the Secure Sockets Layer protocols.
• Rapid IP cycling: Attackers often rotate IPs every few seconds to avoid triggering rate limits, account lockouts, or geofencing rules. This behavior mimics legitimate services like content delivery networks (CDNs).

Sophisticated proxy browser use often goes undetected until an attack succeeds—making prevention and early detection critical.

How to Detect and Defend Against Proxy Browser Abuse

Traditional IP blocklists aren’t enough to identify malicious proxy use. Organizations need to combine traffic analysis, threat intelligence, and behavioral detection strategies.

Recommended defenses include:

• Deep Packet Inspection (DPI): Analyze traffic characteristics at the packet level to spot irregularities that may indicate proxy use.
• TLS fingerprinting: Identify rare or suspicious TLS client configurations—used by certain proxy tools—that differ from standard browser fingerprints.
• Geo-velocity and impossible travel detection: Flag logins or sessions that originate from geographically implausible locations in unrealistic timeframes.
• User Behavior Analytics (UBA): Track individual account activity over time to detect anomalies in usage, login patterns, or access times.
• Reputation-based filtering: Use external threat intelligence to assess proxy IPs, flagging those associated with botnets or credential stuffing attacks.

Organizations should apply these techniques not just to internal endpoints but across third-party integrations and vendor portals.

Third-Party Risk and Proxy Browser Exposure

Proxy browser misuse isn’t limited to your internal network. Vendors, contractors, and partners often operate outside your direct control but have access to your data, APIs, or applications.

Examples of proxy-related third-party risks include:

• Remote employees of vendors using unmonitored proxy browsers to access client portals
• Contractors running scraping scripts from compromised proxy endpoints
• Business partners using shared proxy services that leak DNS or session data

Third-party proxy misuse can expose customer data, bypass geofencing controls, or create audit gaps—especially when the proxy traffic blends with legitimate business activity. Monitoring all your traffic and internet usage—particularly those linked to anonymous proxy or web proxy server activity—is essential.

SecurityScorecard can help provide visibility into proxy browser misuse.

Our platform helps you:

• Identify proxy-enabled infrastructure linked to your supply chain
• Flag suspicious traffic or abnormal traffic from botnets
• Receive alerts tied to DNS health, exposed ports, or SQL payloads using Tor proxies

With continuous monitoring, you gain early warning of risky third-party behaviors—including those that rely on proxy browsers to conceal malicious intent.

Proxy Browsers Require Vigilance Across the Supply Chain

Proxy browsers are dual-use tools. They’re legitimate for privacy, but can be dangerous in the wrong hands. Security teams can no longer afford to rely on IP lists alone or assume trusted vendors aren’t using risky infrastructure.

By combining behavioral detection, layered analytics, and continuous third-party monitoring, organizations can uncover proxy misuse early—and respond before damage is done.

SecurityScorecard provides the insight you need to close these visibility gaps across your digital ecosystem, helping you build a more resilient security posture.

Experience Comprehensive Cyber Risk Management with MAX
SecurityScorecard’s MAX is a fully managed service that combines our advanced platform with expert driven remediation. We handle the complexities of supply chain cybersecurity, allowing you to focus on your strategic business operations.

🔗 Discover MAX