Why customers choose SecurityScorecard over Panorays
Up-to-date & Current
SecurityScorecard Data refreshes within 24 hours for always-current, reliable risk signals
Data Quality
Full accuracy and correction speed transparency, plus 90+ integrations with leading enterprise platforms
Managed TPRM Services
TITAN MAX delivers full TPRM program management — from questionnaires to complete program oversight
Proven where others fall short
Current Data is Actionable Data
Data currency is a vital as Data Accuracy. SecurityScorecard’s extensive scanning infrastructure not only ensures an accuracy level of 99.9% or better, but also is able to rescan our vendors’ digital footprints within 24 hours, ensuring that the information you see in TITAN is always current, rather than being several days out of date.
- Rescan rates of 24 hours or less
Unparalleled Accuracy and Transparency
SecurityScorecard collects 99.9% of the data utilized by TITAN. This ensures that data presented is curated and reconciled directly by SecurityScorecard, but that any updates or needed refinements happen quickly.
- Data accuracy and correction speeds are public, not hidden
- < 4 hours average response time to remediate inaccuracies
MAX: Your TPRM Program, Fully Managed
MAX Services provide a comprehensive suite of management offerings for your TPRM program.
- MAX Questionnaires enable customers to offload one of the most demanding yet vital aspects of the TPRM to our experts, while still enabling the customer to manage the overall program
- MAX Monitor enables customers to offload the day-to-day management of their TPRM Program, freeing up key resources
- MAX Respond handles vendor engagement and escalation when potential risks or issues are identified within the supply chain
See what our customers think
Compare SecurityScorecard with other tools
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How should organizations evaluate the fairness and transparency of risk scoring methodology when comparing TPRM platforms?
Scoring methodology should be evaluated on two dimensions: transparency and fairness. Transparency means the platform publishes how scores are calculated and what actions will improve them. Fairness means the methodology appropriately accounts for compensatory controls and remediation actions in a way that reflects actual risk posture. SecurityScorecard publishes its complete scoring methodology, validates scores against real-world breach likelihood, and reflects remediation and mitigating controls appropriately. Panorays has a documented limitation in this area — its platform can penalize findings even when compensatory controls are declared, which may not accurately reflect an organization’s true risk posture and can complicate vendor conversations around score accuracy.
What role does vendor accessibility and engagement play in the effectiveness of a TPRM platform — and how do SecurityScorecard and Panorays compare?
A TPRM platform is only as effective as the vendor engagement it enables. If suppliers are reluctant to engage with findings, dispute inaccuracies, or track remediation progress, the program’s ability to drive real risk improvement is limited. Panorays has a documented challenge with vendor participation — some suppliers resist engaging with its platform, requiring manual follow-up to drive responses. SecurityScorecard’s model includes permanent, free vendor access and benefits from broad market recognition, actively rating over 12 million companies globally. This familiarity reduces friction and supports higher natural engagement rates, making it easier to drive meaningful supplier participation without requiring enforcement overhead.
